<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Picture Imperfect</title>
	<link>http://pictureimperfect.net</link>
	<description>Perfect Insights on Imperfect Products - by Alain Breillatt</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 16:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on You Can&#8217;t Innovate Like Apple by Phil Myers</title>
		<link>http://pictureimperfect.net/2008/03/21/you-cant-innovate-like-apple/#comment-31</link>
		<author>Phil Myers</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 22:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pictureimperfect.net/2008/03/21/you-cant-innovate-like-apple/#comment-31</guid>
					<description>Wow Alain.  Quite an in-depth post and much appreciated.  

One of the things we had to tackle head-on in the book we're releasing this June (title is Tuned In) was the subject of Innovation and specifically how it applies to the poster child for it ... Apple. We found many of the same things you did. The concept of building your company around a culture of 'Innovation is Everything' is inpractical and ultimately highly risky. And it's because of a fundamental issues of the amount of time &#38; money it requires and one big one that Apple was able to overcome ... finding a real market problem and having the built-in fortitude to stick with it until they created a complete experience that solves it. 

Research is a funny thing that most people think about wrong. It's not something you farm out to a bunch of analysts to gather data so that you can prove a business case, it's real world observation by experts who are really good at market sensing and problem solving. Out of that grows the ability to innovate and produce the kinds of breakthroughs Apple has. We found that it's much less about the process of innovation than the fact that it was based on something real. Everything else is secondary. 

Rather than be discouraged by this though, I'd encourage entrepreneurs and product developers to be encouraged by it. If you narrow the focus, you have a much better chance of creating the kind of breakthrough in your space that Apple did in theirs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow Alain.  Quite an in-depth post and much appreciated.  </p>
<p>One of the things we had to tackle head-on in the book we&#8217;re releasing this June (title is Tuned In) was the subject of Innovation and specifically how it applies to the poster child for it &#8230; Apple. We found many of the same things you did. The concept of building your company around a culture of &#8216;Innovation is Everything&#8217; is inpractical and ultimately highly risky. And it&#8217;s because of a fundamental issues of the amount of time &amp; money it requires and one big one that Apple was able to overcome &#8230; finding a real market problem and having the built-in fortitude to stick with it until they created a complete experience that solves it. </p>
<p>Research is a funny thing that most people think about wrong. It&#8217;s not something you farm out to a bunch of analysts to gather data so that you can prove a business case, it&#8217;s real world observation by experts who are really good at market sensing and problem solving. Out of that grows the ability to innovate and produce the kinds of breakthroughs Apple has. We found that it&#8217;s much less about the process of innovation than the fact that it was based on something real. Everything else is secondary. </p>
<p>Rather than be discouraged by this though, I&#8217;d encourage entrepreneurs and product developers to be encouraged by it. If you narrow the focus, you have a much better chance of creating the kind of breakthrough in your space that Apple did in theirs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on You Can&#8217;t Innovate Like Apple by Steve Johnson</title>
		<link>http://pictureimperfect.net/2008/03/21/you-cant-innovate-like-apple/#comment-30</link>
		<author>Steve Johnson</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 21:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pictureimperfect.net/2008/03/21/you-cant-innovate-like-apple/#comment-30</guid>
					<description>This is an incredibly insightful and comprehensive article. It's almost an entire course in design all by itself. Design is a passion! Companies that try to copy Apple or BOSE or Bang &#38; Olufsen don't seem to realize that you have to spend time on stuff that doesn't show up on the financial plan or in a specific customer request. A great product is the aggregation of a thousand right choices by a team that loves what they do.

Thanks for sharing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an incredibly insightful and comprehensive article. It&#8217;s almost an entire course in design all by itself. Design is a passion! Companies that try to copy Apple or BOSE or Bang &amp; Olufsen don&#8217;t seem to realize that you have to spend time on stuff that doesn&#8217;t show up on the financial plan or in a specific customer request. A great product is the aggregation of a thousand right choices by a team that loves what they do.</p>
<p>Thanks for sharing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Designing for the World&#8217;s Poor by Picture Imperfect &#187; Bringing Symbols of Prosperity to the Masses</title>
		<link>http://pictureimperfect.net/2007/06/01/designing-for-the-worlds-poor/#comment-21</link>
		<author>Picture Imperfect &#187; Bringing Symbols of Prosperity to the Masses</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 14:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pictureimperfect.net/2007/06/01/designing-for-the-worlds-poor/#comment-21</guid>
					<description>[...] an earlier post I examined Dr. Paul Polak&#8217;s focus of designing for the other 90 percent of the world.  By [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] an earlier post I examined Dr. Paul Polak&#8217;s focus of designing for the other 90 percent of the world.  By [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Spring renewal - or reinventing a product by Ravneet Grewal</title>
		<link>http://pictureimperfect.net/2007/04/13/spring-renewal-or-reinventing-a-product/#comment-4</link>
		<author>Ravneet Grewal</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 00:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pictureimperfect.net/2007/04/13/spring-renewal-or-reinventing-a-product/#comment-4</guid>
					<description>Excellent points Alain. I agree with 'starting with a pre-defined-product' and failing to deliver what the users are actually looking for. This is where I guess software teams (and product management) going Agile, where there is a continuous feedback from the real users, without actually upsetting the deadlines (and the corporate honchos pushing for a date!).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent points Alain. I agree with &#8217;starting with a pre-defined-product&#8217; and failing to deliver what the users are actually looking for. This is where I guess software teams (and product management) going Agile, where there is a continuous feedback from the real users, without actually upsetting the deadlines (and the corporate honchos pushing for a date!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hello world! by Ravneet Grewal</title>
		<link>http://pictureimperfect.net/2007/03/29/hello-world/#comment-3</link>
		<author>Ravneet Grewal</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 23:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pictureimperfect.net/2007/03/29/hello-world/#comment-3</guid>
					<description>Welcome to the world of blogging. Hoping to see more from you Alain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to the world of blogging. Hoping to see more from you Alain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
